|
Age:
Adult
Violence: Almost none (a fist fight near the end)
Sex: Lots is implied, but not too graphic.
If you are looking for blood and guts or
wild car chases, this is not the film for you, though there is
a bit of fast driving in one scene. Neither is this an esoteric,
heavy psychological film that you go to once a year to keep your
more cerebral partner happy.
Afterglow is spellbinding.
Is afterglow, in
the wake of the discovery of love, a soft and gentle light
that lingers thoughtfully or is it a dim light that slowly
fades and hints of the end?
|
Two couples, each caught in their own marital
trap, seek deliverance from their personal demons.
A young wife, Marianne (Lara Flynn Boyle),
desperately wants love (and a baby) from her egotistical, self-centered,
insensitive, yuppie, businessman husband, Jeffrey (Jonny Lee Miller),
who appears to have the emotional I.Q. of a frog. He is perhaps
the most shallow (and least likable) character in the film. He's
not too sure what he wants but the safe strings-free attention
of women his mother's age, with soft and gently wrinkled skin,
attracts him and he appears to flirt with the idea of joining
the ranks of his gay business associate's friends. Jeffrey gives
Marianne neither the love nor the sex that she wants and his rejection
is made sharper by his cruel words.
And then there are Phyllis and Lucky. Phyllis
is British, an aging former actress, and Lucky, her fix-it-man
husband, is American and a former sailor. Phyllis painfully seeks
romantic love in the memories of movies she made long ago with
a leading man who died the day our film opens. Lucky looks for
physical love with any woman whose pipes or door locks need fixing,
yet there is the touch of an old-fashioned moralizer about him.
Julie Christie deserves an Academy Award for her role as Phyllis.
Nick Nolte is brilliant as Lucky.
In the case of Phyllis and Lucky, it
is clear that there is more to their difficulty in connecting
than meets the eye and, indeed, their dark secret is revealed
about halfway through the film. With Marianne and Jeffrey, however,
one is never sure how much is there.
As opposed to the older couple, we are given
none of their history, emotional or otherwise. We wonder why we
are told so little about this young couple. Is it because they
really lead a shallow existence, or could the message here be
that as the story unfolds, they are building their history and
perhaps, one day, in a period of marital crisis, this current
crisis will be what they look back on and remember as the event
that made them what they are? This explanation creates a kind
of time warp for the viewer; in order to fully probe the significance
of the relationships of the two couples, one has to peer either
into the past or into the future.
There are
moments when we feel like shaking the young Jeffrey and shouting
at him, "Wake up and listen to your wife! Communicate! Give
her what she wants! Try sharing yourself!" But Jeffrey indicates
that all Marianne cares about is her inner world and her need
for love, sex and a baby and that she doesn't ask him about his
world.
Symbolically, they like different music
(
different art, different priorities in house repairs
)
and each one is always switching channels on the other, leading
to a very funny scene near the end when they roll back and forth
over the remote control, symbolizing an instability in their lives
similar to the frenetic music that issues forth.
Phyllis and Lucky also get caught up
in what appears to be broken record arguments, but it is clear
that they cannot get beyond them not because of childish, immature
attitudes, but because of deep wounds that will not heal.
As each character, for his or her reasons,
reaches out to another, sometimes painfully, sometimes manipulatively,
sometimes kindly, we see that it is solving nothing. Each spouse
will ultimately have to confront his/her other half and, in the
process, himself.
Unlike movies of the genre like Bridges
of Madison County, that are beautifully filmed, with wonderful
music, and ultimately glorify infidelity, supposedly for a higher
purpose, Afterglow makes no such claims. One wonders about
the meaning of the name, alluded to early in the film by Phyllis.
Is afterglow, in the wake of the discovery of love, a soft and
gentle light that lingers thoughtfully or is it a dim light that
slowly fades and hints of the end?
The ultimate confrontation takes place
between Lucky and Phyllis, and between Lucky and another person
who shares their secret. Their confrontations are real and full
of pain and passion. Out of the primal screams, hope for their
marriage is reborn. We are not so reassured about Jeffrey and
Marianne, but a part of us wants to believe that they, like the
older couple, will learn something from their mistakes. However,
a marital therapist would probably not lay odds on this couple
making it.
Afterglow
is about deep longing, caring, communication, rejection, jealousy,
regret and the desire to share. It probably leads a lot of married
couples to leave the theater pondering the definition of love.
|