|
Great poets and writers, whether young
or old, live with a sense of mortality: all men die; we live our
lives under the shadow of its end. Writers make us conscious of
the passage of time, and the loss that it entails, which we, who
reach our elder years, are only too aware of as we increasingly
confront loss. Great works of literature are the best self-help
guides. They're not into "denial" of life's difficulties.
Instead, pain and the fear of death, are confronted, and transformed
through art and help us cherish the world all the more.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the
works of William Shakespeare (1564-1616), the greatest English
writer of all time. For Shakespeare, time, Janus-like, has two
faces. On one hand, it is the revealer of truth: Time brings forth
understanding and wisdom, though people are not necessarily wise
just because they are old. King Lear, one of Shakespeare's great
tragic heroes, was an old man at the beginning of the play but
was quite foolish and proud. It is only through experience, and
the process of ripening (in Lear's situation, through great suffering),
that growth takes place. Time brings seed to fruition and ripening.
And as Lear declares, "Ripeness Is All."
At the same time, time is the great destroyer.
It devours youth, defaces proud buildings, despoils beauty, and
brings down the proud. Time is the Grim Reaper, swinging his scythe,
cutting down everything in sight. Anyone touched by death has
felt this destruction, the sense of waste and nothingness. Thoughtful
people, young and old, have struggled with it.
In the book Shakespeare's
Imagery, critic Caroline Spurgeon explains that Shakespeare
is expressing the medieval view of time as "the great devourer
and destroyer." But he goes beyond the temporary and the
temporal, to assert values that withstand time and destruction.
|
What
values do you feel remain, withstanding time and death?
|
Shakespeare's sonnets, probably written
between 1593 and 1596 (and containing many puzzling references
to people he loved), offer an answer to this. But first, let us
look at Sonnet 30. How uncannily Shakespeare, who was only in
his thirties when he wrote the sonnets, sums up the reflections
of the older person looking back upon his life!
Sonnet 30
When to the sessions of sweet,
silent thought
I summon remembrances of things past,
I sigh the lack of many a thing I sought,
|
What
hopes did you have that were disappointed?
|
And with old woes new wail my dear time's waste:
|
In
what ways do you feel you've wasted your life?
|
Then can I drown an eye, unused
to flow,
For precious friends hid in death's dateless night,
And weep afresh love's long since cancelled woe,
And moan the expense of many a vanish'd sight:
|
What
losses is he mourning?
|
Then can I grieve at grievances
foregone,
And heavily from woe to woe tell o'er
The sad account of fore bemoaned moan,
Which I new pay, as if not paid before.
But if the while I think on thee, dear friend,
All losses are restored and sorrows end.
|
What
does this mean? What makes up for all the losses, even erases
them, restores the world anew, and redeems it from despair?
|
For Shakespeare, it is "thee
dear friend," that redeems the world from time's ravages.
Friendship, and more generally, love, is the eternal, unalterable
value that is not affected by time and change. "Love's not
Time's Fool," says Shakespeare in Sonnet 116. Everything
else is affected by time and change: youth, beauty, strength,
power, prestige. All fades. Love alone remains.
|
Is
this true? Doesn't love also pass? Otherwise, how do we
explain divorce,
jealousy, rifts between lovers, conflict between parents
and children?
|
Shakespeare's answer to this can
also be found in Sonnet 116 mentioned above when he says "Love
is not love/Which alters when it alteration finds." In other
words, Shakespeare is not talking about whimsical, capricious
human love, the transitory feelings that are mistaken for love.
He celebrates romantic love in many of his plays, like Romeo and
Juliet, but it is just a reflection of some higher, more profound
love.
A man of the Renaissance influenced
by the Neoplatonic ideal of love, he is referring to the basic
eternal principle of love that is structured into the world, and
underlies everything else -- friendship, love between man and
woman, love of children. We yearn for this eternal, unchanging
love. It alone defeats death and the vagaries of time.
|